www.flickr.com

« DON'T DIAL SPRINT | Main | Conversational Identity »

Escalating Online Costs

I'm not sure how I feel about this Ruling Backs Anti-Spam Activist (TechNews.com)

"An Internet site that provides personal information about an alleged purveyor of mass e-mail is not harassment and does not need to be removed, a Maryland district court judge ruled yesterday."

I haven't looked at the anti-spam site in detail.  .  While it is on Slashdot too. Francis Uy's (Spamhaus?) personal site is not so  obvious. He says:

"George tried to send me a message, and wanted to make an example of me," he wrote. "Instead I had a message for him: Every time you try to mess with me, I will post it on the 'Net, and more people will learn about you. I don't encourage harassment against you, and I don't need to. The facts speak quite loudly enough. Your best option is to crawl back under a rock and suck it up, or move to some state other than the one I live in."

This solution looks like the makings a larger arms race. I note that John Robb posts today on a McAfee anti-spam product.  How much will that cost?  It's $39.95.   

John says:"Hmmm. I just installed the McAfee anti-spam program.  It seems to work relatively well however, it doesn't seem to be able to force my e-mail program (Outlook Express) to gather new e-mails after it spots a valid e-mail during a check.  Here is a datapoint:  I got 950 spam messages this weekend.   Today I got 2. [John Robb's Radio Weblog]"  

Looks like the consumer costs of being online just keep escalating! It will need a consumer centric solution.  McAfee only makes money on this product as long as spam exists. Don't see them sponsoring Spamhaus! 

Recent Comments

My Furl

Archives

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by
Movable Type 3.32