<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: KM World 2007 Media Policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.henshall.com/stuart/2007/10/11/km-world-2007-media-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.henshall.com/stuart/2007/10/11/km-world-2007-media-policy/</link>
	<description>an unbound place for inquiry, conversation... feed the spiral</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: KMWorld conference from a distance at Sims Learning Connections</title>
		<link>http://www.henshall.com/stuart/2007/10/11/km-world-2007-media-policy/#comment-1176</link>
		<dc:creator>KMWorld conference from a distance at Sims Learning Connections</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 01:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.henshall.com/stuart/2007/10/11/km-world-2007-media-policy/#comment-1176</guid>
		<description>[...] content? Similar irony noted in these comments at Stuart Henshall&#8217;s Blog, and Stuart&#8217;s post regarding the Media Policy, both I discovered later in my journey, as noted below. I do think KMWorld missed some opportunity [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] content? Similar irony noted in these comments at Stuart Henshall&#8217;s Blog, and Stuart&#8217;s post regarding the Media Policy, both I discovered later in my journey, as noted below. I do think KMWorld missed some opportunity [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://www.henshall.com/stuart/2007/10/11/km-world-2007-media-policy/#comment-1146</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 17:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.henshall.com/stuart/2007/10/11/km-world-2007-media-policy/#comment-1146</guid>
		<description>Hi Eric, 
I still think the primary reason for the policy was "selling a CD-Rom" after the event. I have no problem with that. I do believe that where upstreaming TV live during the event is available you can generate significant goodwill and build the platform and community for future conferences. 

From my perspective I went there to learn. I've covered many of the sessions I was in. I captured much of what was said and added a few of my own thoughts too. 

I don't think full podcasts of events should be put up; I don't think anyone should put up a complete video either without permission. 

I'm coming from a view that the conference loses overall by not enabling and encouraging people to share what they are hearing, providing pointers to where the info may be found etc. I made an issue only of this media policy (many conferences are the same) because I thought the community was about collaboration, sharing etc. I also think participants need to understand and use the new tools. 

The best way to insure that a conference received balanced reporting via blogs, wikis etc is to build in and model a group of people to take that role in it. Otherwise you run the risk of one blogger representing the show. That may not be a problem, or it may be. 

So.... my purpose was really to point out that conferences require a social media strategy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Eric,<br />
I still think the primary reason for the policy was &#8220;selling a CD-Rom&#8221; after the event. I have no problem with that. I do believe that where upstreaming TV live during the event is available you can generate significant goodwill and build the platform and community for future conferences. </p>
<p>From my perspective I went there to learn. I&#8217;ve covered many of the sessions I was in. I captured much of what was said and added a few of my own thoughts too. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think full podcasts of events should be put up; I don&#8217;t think anyone should put up a complete video either without permission. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m coming from a view that the conference loses overall by not enabling and encouraging people to share what they are hearing, providing pointers to where the info may be found etc. I made an issue only of this media policy (many conferences are the same) because I thought the community was about collaboration, sharing etc. I also think participants need to understand and use the new tools. </p>
<p>The best way to insure that a conference received balanced reporting via blogs, wikis etc is to build in and model a group of people to take that role in it. Otherwise you run the risk of one blogger representing the show. That may not be a problem, or it may be. </p>
<p>So&#8230;. my purpose was really to point out that conferences require a social media strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Mack</title>
		<link>http://www.henshall.com/stuart/2007/10/11/km-world-2007-media-policy/#comment-1138</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Mack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 08:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.henshall.com/stuart/2007/10/11/km-world-2007-media-policy/#comment-1138</guid>
		<description>Stuart, as a presenter at KNWorld, I can share that in our speaker's packet we were asked to sign a form indicating our preference to allow/not allow recording. So, Jane did the right thing by indicating that the speakers have the final say. I've blogged many of the sessions and will post them soon. I even asked for photos and got them from all but Ms. Allee. (She got away before I could ask her). If you are at the conference, find me. Eric</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stuart, as a presenter at KNWorld, I can share that in our speaker&#8217;s packet we were asked to sign a form indicating our preference to allow/not allow recording. So, Jane did the right thing by indicating that the speakers have the final say. I&#8217;ve blogged many of the sessions and will post them soon. I even asked for photos and got them from all but Ms. Allee. (She got away before I could ask her). If you are at the conference, find me. Eric</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://www.henshall.com/stuart/2007/10/11/km-world-2007-media-policy/#comment-991</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 02:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.henshall.com/stuart/2007/10/11/km-world-2007-media-policy/#comment-991</guid>
		<description>Jane,
 
I really appreciate your response and like the revised tone which is so much warmer and more welcoming.  

I think this is the right way to encourage participants to share their learnings and use social media to talk about the conference, create excitement around it, and push it forward.  

That's great particularly for an event like KM World, where sharing knowledge must be the core culture, and what better than to actually demonstrate how this can be done with social tools and media like blogs, wikis etc - learning by doing in some ways! 

I also recognize that there are restrictions written into contracts with speakers and the explanation is far more 'transparent' in this version; one that people would respect and hopefully abide by. Perhaps there is an opportunity to revisit future event contracts. 

While I used KMWorld2007 as my example I could have made the same point about many other conferences. I'm very conscious you are not alone. Concurrently, I'll have to do more research to identify conferences that might illustrate best practice. I think Supernova2007 and some of the O'Reilly conferences would be a good place to start.

I also found myself watching Poptech this week via live.poptech.org. I'm sure all the presenters knew there would be a live feed. While it's technically possible to "capture it" I doubt anyone did for more than personal use. I don't think anything was stated about it. In the past Poptech has made videos available; however I think their approach is also changing as I see Popicasts now available. Similarly they have distributed content via ITConversations in the past. 


An additional thought I had in the context of blogging and how to share better - at many conferences I have been to, bloggers are encouraged to send in their URL's and relevant content from their blogs is often aggregated on the official website --- this in some ways encourages people to talk about it more, and allows you to share with your community what people are feeling about the sessions, speakers, the informal exchanges and the event. 

I look forward to attending. 

Stuart</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jane,</p>
<p>I really appreciate your response and like the revised tone which is so much warmer and more welcoming.  </p>
<p>I think this is the right way to encourage participants to share their learnings and use social media to talk about the conference, create excitement around it, and push it forward.  </p>
<p>That&#8217;s great particularly for an event like KM World, where sharing knowledge must be the core culture, and what better than to actually demonstrate how this can be done with social tools and media like blogs, wikis etc - learning by doing in some ways! </p>
<p>I also recognize that there are restrictions written into contracts with speakers and the explanation is far more &#8216;transparent&#8217; in this version; one that people would respect and hopefully abide by. Perhaps there is an opportunity to revisit future event contracts. </p>
<p>While I used KMWorld2007 as my example I could have made the same point about many other conferences. I&#8217;m very conscious you are not alone. Concurrently, I&#8217;ll have to do more research to identify conferences that might illustrate best practice. I think Supernova2007 and some of the O&#8217;Reilly conferences would be a good place to start.</p>
<p>I also found myself watching Poptech this week via live.poptech.org. I&#8217;m sure all the presenters knew there would be a live feed. While it&#8217;s technically possible to &#8220;capture it&#8221; I doubt anyone did for more than personal use. I don&#8217;t think anything was stated about it. In the past Poptech has made videos available; however I think their approach is also changing as I see Popicasts now available. Similarly they have distributed content via ITConversations in the past. </p>
<p>An additional thought I had in the context of blogging and how to share better - at many conferences I have been to, bloggers are encouraged to send in their URL&#8217;s and relevant content from their blogs is often aggregated on the official website &#8212; this in some ways encourages people to talk about it more, and allows you to share with your community what people are feeling about the sessions, speakers, the informal exchanges and the event. </p>
<p>I look forward to attending. </p>
<p>Stuart</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane Dysart</title>
		<link>http://www.henshall.com/stuart/2007/10/11/km-world-2007-media-policy/#comment-988</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane Dysart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 16:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.henshall.com/stuart/2007/10/11/km-world-2007-media-policy/#comment-988</guid>
		<description>As conference chair of KMWorld &#38; Intranets, I talked to our VP of Content at Information Today.  He says he could go along with some of this, but can't go against the law.  Only the speaker/author can grant a creative commons license, so ITI can't liberally grant it for them, since we don't own their content.  He agrees that the existing policy statement can be toned down.  How about this?

MEDIA ADVISORY: Information Today, Inc. welcomes press and blog coverage of our conferences. We encourage all participants to share information and their learnings. Please tag content uploads with the relevant tags; KMWorld2007, Speaker, topic or session tags as provided.  The content of individual talks, presentation graphics, and handouts belongs to the speakers.  Some contracts with speakers specifically prohibit the audio/video recording and/or broadcasting of their remarks.  Therefore, written permission is required to publish, broadcast, or otherwise distribute entire transcripts or audio/video recordings of entire talks  by any means, including “podcasting.” Brief excerpts, quotes, and short audio/video segments are encouraged, in the context of your comments on a blog or other publishing platform.  Please link to official transcripts, handouts, or other media objects hosted at the speakers’ or Information Today, Inc.’s Web sites.  Promoting knowledge management is our goal. Thank you for helping us share.

Your thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As conference chair of KMWorld &amp; Intranets, I talked to our VP of Content at Information Today.  He says he could go along with some of this, but can&#8217;t go against the law.  Only the speaker/author can grant a creative commons license, so ITI can&#8217;t liberally grant it for them, since we don&#8217;t own their content.  He agrees that the existing policy statement can be toned down.  How about this?</p>
<p>MEDIA ADVISORY: Information Today, Inc. welcomes press and blog coverage of our conferences. We encourage all participants to share information and their learnings. Please tag content uploads with the relevant tags; KMWorld2007, Speaker, topic or session tags as provided.  The content of individual talks, presentation graphics, and handouts belongs to the speakers.  Some contracts with speakers specifically prohibit the audio/video recording and/or broadcasting of their remarks.  Therefore, written permission is required to publish, broadcast, or otherwise distribute entire transcripts or audio/video recordings of entire talks  by any means, including “podcasting.” Brief excerpts, quotes, and short audio/video segments are encouraged, in the context of your comments on a blog or other publishing platform.  Please link to official transcripts, handouts, or other media objects hosted at the speakers’ or Information Today, Inc.’s Web sites.  Promoting knowledge management is our goal. Thank you for helping us share.</p>
<p>Your thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
