<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dave Pollard on Social Tools @ KMWorld</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.henshall.com/stuart/2007/11/06/dave-pollard-on-social-tools/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.henshall.com/stuart/2007/11/06/dave-pollard-on-social-tools/</link>
	<description>an unbound place for inquiry, conversation... feed the spiral</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 00:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: KMWorld conference from a distance at Sims Learning Connections</title>
		<link>http://www.henshall.com/stuart/2007/11/06/dave-pollard-on-social-tools/#comment-1175</link>
		<dc:creator>KMWorld conference from a distance at Sims Learning Connections</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 01:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.henshall.com/stuart/2007/11/06/dave-pollard-on-social-tools/#comment-1175</guid>
		<description>[...] other del.icio.us KMWorld2007 link was Stuart Henshall&#8217;s more in-depth summary of Dave Pollard&#8217;s session, which then sent me looking at all the other posts from Stuart [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] other del.icio.us KMWorld2007 link was Stuart Henshall&#8217;s more in-depth summary of Dave Pollard&#8217;s session, which then sent me looking at all the other posts from Stuart [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://www.henshall.com/stuart/2007/11/06/dave-pollard-on-social-tools/#comment-1147</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 17:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.henshall.com/stuart/2007/11/06/dave-pollard-on-social-tools/#comment-1147</guid>
		<description>Archy, Thanks for the feedback. I've reported Dave's list. I'd agree with you that basecamp is so-so, although it illustrates well the genre for that type of tool. I frankly find they don't fit everyone's work practices. Thanks for the link to wrike, I'll check it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Archy, Thanks for the feedback. I&#8217;ve reported Dave&#8217;s list. I&#8217;d agree with you that basecamp is so-so, although it illustrates well the genre for that type of tool. I frankly find they don&#8217;t fit everyone&#8217;s work practices. Thanks for the link to wrike, I&#8217;ll check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Archy Krane</title>
		<link>http://www.henshall.com/stuart/2007/11/06/dave-pollard-on-social-tools/#comment-1140</link>
		<dc:creator>Archy Krane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 10:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.henshall.com/stuart/2007/11/06/dave-pollard-on-social-tools/#comment-1140</guid>
		<description>Interesting post. I agree with most of what you say. But I don't agree the Basecamp is one of the better tools for project management. I've tried it and it definetely lacks some features. Moreover, its creators don't what to add anything to the feature set. I'm using Wrike for my projects. Take a look if you're interested http://www.wrike.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post. I agree with most of what you say. But I don&#8217;t agree the Basecamp is one of the better tools for project management. I&#8217;ve tried it and it definetely lacks some features. Moreover, its creators don&#8217;t what to add anything to the feature set. I&#8217;m using Wrike for my projects. Take a look if you&#8217;re interested <a href="http://www.wrike.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.wrike.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
