<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: links for 2007-11-26</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.henshall.com/stuart/2007/11/26/links-for-2007-11-26/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.henshall.com/stuart/2007/11/26/links-for-2007-11-26/</link>
	<description>futurist + strategist + innovator ....making &#34;sense&#34; actionable</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:39:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Mower</title>
		<link>http://www.henshall.com/stuart/2007/11/26/links-for-2007-11-26/comment-page-1/#comment-1391</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Mower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 09:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.henshall.com/stuart/2007/11/26/links-for-2007-11-26/#comment-1391</guid>
		<description>Hi Stuart.

Having been involved in an effort to sell privacy protection to individuals and vendors I think I am quite sensitive to the issues so maybe it&#039;s worth treating me as an early warning indicator.

What Facebook and others are doing has made me very uncomfortable; they&#039;re changing the deal and in ways I don&#039;t like. I think there were ways to implement Beacon and Social Ads that, while they would have followed a less sharp revenue growth curve, would not have rung alarm bells for me. They choose not to go that way. More here:

  http://matt.blogs.it/entries/00002718.html

I think Facebook and the rest have gotten an overinflated view of their importance to us. What, after all, do they actually do? They run a website with some gadgets on it. They&#039;re good at marketing. Nothing about their site is particularly rocket science or even innovative. They were just the best at packaging those features for a generation that was receptive to the idea of social networking sites.

But, as with blogging, I believe we don&#039;t need large corporations to do social networking and, in bringing the network back under our control, we gain benefits and protection from interests other than our own.

Anyway... just a little more perspective on my views.

Cheers,

Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Stuart.</p>
<p>Having been involved in an effort to sell privacy protection to individuals and vendors I think I am quite sensitive to the issues so maybe it&#8217;s worth treating me as an early warning indicator.</p>
<p>What Facebook and others are doing has made me very uncomfortable; they&#8217;re changing the deal and in ways I don&#8217;t like. I think there were ways to implement Beacon and Social Ads that, while they would have followed a less sharp revenue growth curve, would not have rung alarm bells for me. They choose not to go that way. More here:</p>
<p>  <a href="http://matt.blogs.it/entries/00002718.html" rel="nofollow">http://matt.blogs.it/entries/00002718.html</a></p>
<p>I think Facebook and the rest have gotten an overinflated view of their importance to us. What, after all, do they actually do? They run a website with some gadgets on it. They&#8217;re good at marketing. Nothing about their site is particularly rocket science or even innovative. They were just the best at packaging those features for a generation that was receptive to the idea of social networking sites.</p>
<p>But, as with blogging, I believe we don&#8217;t need large corporations to do social networking and, in bringing the network back under our control, we gain benefits and protection from interests other than our own.</p>
<p>Anyway&#8230; just a little more perspective on my views.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A brewing PR problem for Skype : NevilleHobson.com</title>
		<link>http://www.henshall.com/stuart/2007/11/26/links-for-2007-11-26/comment-page-1/#comment-1375</link>
		<dc:creator>A brewing PR problem for Skype : NevilleHobson.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 11:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.henshall.com/stuart/2007/11/26/links-for-2007-11-26/#comment-1375</guid>
		<description>[...] also be wondering about the continuity or not of their numbers. There&#8217;s certainly plenty of commentary that&#8217;s filling the vacuum in the absence of any official communication from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] also be wondering about the continuity or not of their numbers. There&#8217;s certainly plenty of commentary that&#8217;s filling the vacuum in the absence of any official communication from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

