<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009 &#8211; We are Talking Emerging Communications Again!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.henshall.com/stuart/2009/01/01/2009-we-are-talking-emerging-communications-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.henshall.com/stuart/2009/01/01/2009-we-are-talking-emerging-communications-again/</link>
	<description>futurist + strategist + innovator ....making &#34;sense&#34; actionable</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 18:53:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mr Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; &#8220;Skype is open&#8221; argument - not even wrong</title>
		<link>http://www.henshall.com/stuart/2009/01/01/2009-we-are-talking-emerging-communications-again/comment-page-1/#comment-4360</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; &#8220;Skype is open&#8221; argument - not even wrong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 16:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.henshall.com/?p=1934#comment-4360</guid>
		<description>[...] I think supporting SIP would be a good idea for Skype, for their own sake, and Stuart Henshall has proposed many times some great ways Skype could make money offering that, I don&#8217;t really care what protocol they [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I think supporting SIP would be a good idea for Skype, for their own sake, and Stuart Henshall has proposed many times some great ways Skype could make money offering that, I don&#8217;t really care what protocol they [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Where is VoIP Heading - Conversation Tonight &#124; stuart henshall</title>
		<link>http://www.henshall.com/stuart/2009/01/01/2009-we-are-talking-emerging-communications-again/comment-page-1/#comment-4342</link>
		<dc:creator>Where is VoIP Heading - Conversation Tonight &#124; stuart henshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.henshall.com/?p=1934#comment-4342</guid>
		<description>[...] You can join at 6:00 PST.  Alec Saunders  advocates &#8220;open communications&#8221;. As I wrote the other day. It&#8217;s about the &#8220;Exchange&#8221; and Alec makes this point by talking about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You can join at 6:00 PST.  Alec Saunders  advocates &#8220;open communications&#8221;. As I wrote the other day. It&#8217;s about the &#8220;Exchange&#8221; and Alec makes this point by talking about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave Michels</title>
		<link>http://www.henshall.com/stuart/2009/01/01/2009-we-are-talking-emerging-communications-again/comment-page-1/#comment-4314</link>
		<dc:creator>dave Michels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 20:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.henshall.com/?p=1934#comment-4314</guid>
		<description>This is right on the money. I believe strongly the value prop of wired telecom has not changed and the value prop of mobile telecom has changed dramatically. To the point that mobile could (if they want to) go after the PBX. 

The PBX vendors are embracing mobility - only making the cell phone value prop even stronger. 

The value prop to the user needs to change. Your points around social media and control are part of that, but I also look at the iPhone App store and the Android Marketplace and see a strong demand for customization and applications for our phones - the always on IP phone with larger display, larger/more keys, and speakers and do so much more. 

Please see my recent blog post on this subject at: http://pindropsoup.blogspot.com/2009/01/pbx-needs-to-change-or-die.html

Thanks,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is right on the money. I believe strongly the value prop of wired telecom has not changed and the value prop of mobile telecom has changed dramatically. To the point that mobile could (if they want to) go after the PBX. </p>
<p>The PBX vendors are embracing mobility &#8211; only making the cell phone value prop even stronger. </p>
<p>The value prop to the user needs to change. Your points around social media and control are part of that, but I also look at the iPhone App store and the Android Marketplace and see a strong demand for customization and applications for our phones &#8211; the always on IP phone with larger display, larger/more keys, and speakers and do so much more. </p>
<p>Please see my recent blog post on this subject at: <a href="http://pindropsoup.blogspot.com/2009/01/pbx-needs-to-change-or-die.html" rel="nofollow">http://pindropsoup.blogspot.com/2009/01/pbx-needs-to-change-or-die.html</a></p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
